IBM Research

How to Fix the Fake News Phenomenon

Share this post:

Academics, medical professionals, humorists and others gathered in New York City last week at the Future Today Summit to share their expertise in how technology is changing the world, and how man can and will adjust to it. Amy Webb, After the event, Founder and CEO of the Future Today Institute, and also an adjunct professor on futures forecasting at the New York University Stern School of Business, connected with the IBM Research Blog to discuss a range of topics. The following is an excerpt of the interview which pertains specifically to the phenomenon of fake news. For the full interview visit IBM Research Blog. 

IBM Research Blog: How does the (near) future deal with fake news?

Amy Webb: This is a bigger and more complicated problem than most of us realize. One of the challenges has to do with data: what’s fake to [one person] may seem very real to someone else. As every research scientist knows, even empirical data is still subject to outside interpretation once a project is reported in the media or talked about by non-scientists. And that’s compounded in this age of social media.

We have machine learning algorithms that are just performing their prescribed functions – deliver us content that we’re likely to click on. The platforms have a financial incentive for us to click, because more clicks equal more income.

aw-site

Amy Webb, Founder & CEO, Future Institute Today

The people who create those realistic looking URLs and who’ve copied popular news sites like CNN – they are also financially incentivized to create scandalous headlines and news stories that people will click on. And our attention spans are decreasing because there’s just so much competition for our eyes, ears and minds.

Let’s be clear – it’s not because of the recent [US] election that people suddenly developed this idea of fake news. Humans have been spreading misinformation since we were first grunting at each other in caves.

About six or seven years ago, we at FTI forecasted this would be an emerging problem. We recommended to a consortium of newspapers that they develop a verification system – a simple line of code – that would travel digitally wherever the news story did. At the time, there wasn’t yet a critical mass of problematic stories as we’re now seeing today, and without an immediate need they didn’t feel a sense of urgency.

I still believe this is the best way forward – to certify and verify news organizations. But now, people are looking to platforms to make that value judgment, and that’s something that makes me uncomfortable. Clearly something needs to be done – but now, everyone is scrambling, and that includes the social platforms.

Leaders should never make decisions under duress. Had they have been using the tools of a futurist, they could have foreseen today’s fake news debacle as a likely scenario and planned accordingly before the crisis hit.

_________________________________________

For the complete interview, visit the IBM Research Blog

Founder & CEO, Future Today Institute

More stories

Meet the Newest IBM Fellows

Since the first class of IBM Fellows in 1962, IBM has honored its top scientists, engineers and programmers, who are chosen for this distinction by the CEO. Among the best and brightest of IBM’s global workforce are 12 new IBM Fellows who join 293 of their peers who have been so recognized over the last […]

Continue reading

How IBM is Advancing AI Once Again & Why it Matters to Your Business

There have been several seminal moments in the recent history of AI. In the mid-1990s, IBM created the Deep Blue system that played and beat world chess champion, Garry Kasparov in a live tournament. In 2011, we unveiled Watson, a natural language question and answering system, and put it on the hit television quiz show, […]

Continue reading

Amplifying the Power of Debate with AI

French essayist, Joseph Joubert, wrote in 1896: “It is better to debate a question without settling it than to settle a question without debating it.” For the last 15 years, I’ve led the nation’s most popular debate organization, ProCon.org. While our public charity has served more than 180 million people since 2004, our obsession with […]

Continue reading